Today’s Question: Like most of your readers, I keep all my photos in Lightroom Classic, but I also have a lot of photos from family and friends that were taken at parties, family events, etc. and they are not in Lightroom. But I’m thinking that maybe they should be so I can use Lightroom’s organizational and search capabilities with them. Do you have any advice about doing this?
Tim’s Quick Answer: Yes, I do think it makes sense to consolidate most (or all) photos into your Lightroom Classic workflow, even if they are from sources other than your own photography or represent categories of photos beyond your normal photography.
More Detail: In general, I prefer to have all photos consolidated with a single workflow. For example, while there tend to be very different motivations for photos I capture with my smartphone compared to my “real” cameras. However, I still keep photos from both types of cameras in a single consolidated Lightroom Classic catalog.
The same holds true for photos I didn’t capture myself. For example, when leading a photo workshop or presenting at an event, sometimes an attendee will capture a photo of me and share it with me. Similarly, old family photos such as childhood photos of myself weren’t captured by me. But I still keep all these photos (and photos in other categories) in my Lightroom Classic catalog.
The overarching goal to me is to be as streamlined and organized as possible. When I’m looking for a photo, regardless of the provenance of the photo, it is helpful to know I can always start my search in my single Lightroom Classic catalog.
Having said all that, I do think it can be helpful to distinguish these photos from your normal photo workflow in some way. For example, I don’t add my copyright and contact information to the metadata for photos I didn’t capture. Similarly, I’ll often organize these other types of photos outside my normal workflow, such as by using a distinct folder structure.
For example, for photos captured by an attendee at an event I was speaking at, I’ll create a subfolder referencing the photographer who captured and shared the images within the folder containing my own photos from the trip. For archival family photos I maintain a separate top-level folder indicating that these are a different category of photos, with organized folders (such as by date range) within that folder.
In addition, there are certainly situations where photographers may want to maintain two distinct workflows. For example, many photographers use an iPhone for casual photography and may be using iCloud synchronization to keep those photos available across all their Apple devices. In that type of situation, it might not make sense to consolidate all photos into a single workflow, since there is generally a relatively clear distinction between the photos in the two different workflows.

